<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best CUV $35-$60,000: Nissan Pathfinder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wheels.ca/reviews/best-cuv-35-60000-nissan-pathfinder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wheels.ca/reviews/best-cuv-35-60000-nissan-pathfinder/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Verner</title>
		<link>http://www.wheels.ca/reviews/best-cuv-35-60000-nissan-pathfinder/#comment-352163</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Verner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-107-20-15-173.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?post_type=reviews&#038;p=31374#comment-352163</guid>
		<description>Generic, unattractiveNissan  design. cheap looking.  Old engine, little electronic upgrades from older model. Too many exta cost options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generic, unattractiveNissan  design. cheap looking.  Old engine, little electronic upgrades from older model. Too many exta cost options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
