Feud-weary Japanese auto part firms fleeing China
Japanese parts-makers rethinking plans to expand in ChinaPublished November 12, 2012
We would like you to participate in a short survey to gather your opinions and feedback about this website. The survey will take no longer than 10 minutes.
Would you like to participate?
Japanese parts-makers rethinking plans to expand in ChinaPublished November 12, 2012
After anti-Japan protesters in China smashed cars and torched dealerships, Koito Manufacturing Co. suspended a plan to triple output in the country.
With a new factory half-built, Koito — a Toyota Motor Corp. supplier — reasoned that it may no longer need it.
“Demand from automakers is unclear, so we don’t know how long we will have to freeze the project,” said Shinji Karasawa, spokesman for the Tokyo-based headlight maker.
Along with Koito, Japanese parts-makers including Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd. and Toyo Tire & Rubber Co. are rethinking plans to expand in China, where Toyota’s sales plunged 41 per cent in September as demonstrations over disputed East China Sea islands flared. The manufacturers are focusing expansion plans on Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar, Indonesia and Cambodia, a sign that this year’s drop in Japanese investment in China may deepen next year, crimping bilateral trade that has tripled to $340 billion in the last decade.
“Our board members had been vaguely wondering if we should move future production out of China; then the protests prodded us to decide to accelerate planning toward moving out,” said Masayoshi Matsumoto, president of Sumitomo Electric, the world’s second-biggest maker of wiring harnesses.
Sumitomo Electric fell 1.6 per cent to 817 yen at the close of trading on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, while Koito fell 1.9 per cent to 998 yen. The benchmark Nikkei 225 Stock Average dropped 0.9 per cent.
Foreign direct investment in China fell 6.8 per cent in September, the 10th decline in 11 months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
By contrast, direct investment by Japanese in China last year surged 74 per cent to $12.6 billion, from $7.3 billion in 2010 and $2.6 billion 10 years earlier, making Japan the biggest investor in China after Hong Kong and Taiwan, according to the Japan External Trade Organization.
Protests in China over Japan’s claims to a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea have slashed sales at Toyota, Nissan Motor Co. and Honda Motor Co. in the world’s second-biggest economy, where some drivers are boycotting goods made by Japanese companies and others are concerned about potential vandalism such a purchase may invite.
Nissan, the biggest Japanese automaker in China by sales, on Nov. 6 cut its sales forecast for China and said the reduction would wipe about 60 billion yen off annual operating income.
“We will be careful about investing in China in the future,” Nissan Chief Operating Officer Toshiyuki Shiga told reporters in Tokyo.
Honda, Japan’s No. 3 carmaker, cut its annual profit outlook 20 per cent to 375 billion yen as Chinese consumers shunned Japanese brands amid the territorial dispute.
The parts-makers supplying Nissan, Honda and Toyota in China, Japan’s largest trading partner, may be even more vulnerable than their customers to declines in auto sales because their businesses are smaller and less globalized.
Mamoru Shimada, president of Osaka-based precision auto- parts-maker Fuserashi Co., cancelled a visit to China originally scheduled for this month after anti-Japanese demonstrations. Instead, he visited Malaysia and Indonesia, seeking opportunities to expand production into those countries.
“We planned to increase capacity in our China business,” Shimada said in an interview. “But with the risks shown by the protests, I’m inclined to expand future production in Thailand, where we already have a factory.”
Shimada said he regularly meets with Japanese carmakers to discuss global and regional expansion plans. In October, plans for China didn’t come up during the meetings, he said.
“That made me feel pessimistic about the future for our business in China,” he said.
China-Japan disputes have periodically surfaced in the decades since World War II over territorial claims and the acknowledgment of responsibility for massacres during Japan’s invasion and partial occupation of the country. At the same time, industrial alliances between the two countries have thrived as Japanese manufacturers sought the country’s lower costs and Chinese companies welcomed Japanese technology and know-how.
The latest cycle of increased tension is prompting some executives to talk about exiting China as a matter of national pride as well as a business decision.
Shimada of Fuserashi likened China’s actions amid the island dispute to an invasion, citing it as a reason to exit the country and focus on emerging markets elsewhere.
“There’s no need to do business at the price of your own territory is being invaded,” he said. “It’s better if we can concentrate in other emerging markets, like Brazil, to make up for the Chinese market.”
China’s failure to prevent anti-Japanese violence came as a surprise and has made the country too risky, said Matsumoto of Sumitomo Electric.
“None of us had expected what happened in September,” he said. “All of our board members now agree on the idea that we should move production out of China to other countries after we saw such big risks.”
Leaving China altogether hasn’t been mentioned as an option by any of Japan’s largest automakers, a sign that it’s unlikely their suppliers would relocate all production to other countries. More likely, the suppliers will reconsider plans to make parts in China for export.
“China remains an important market from which we can’t retreat, but when it comes to increasing investment, we may be more inclined to do it in other countries, such as Malaysia,” Kenji Nakakura, 64, Toyo Tire president, said in a September interview.
The Osaka-based company resumed production Sept. 19 at its factory in Qingdao, China, after suspending it for a day amid anti-Japanese protests.
“Japanese carmakers don’t have much of an option, because the Chinese market is too important,” Lin Huaibin, an automotive analyst at Global Insight Inc., said by phone. “Carmakers have never said they are going to leave China, and if they stay, the parts-makers will have to stay, too.”
Chinese and Japanese officials last week ended two days of talks. China reiterated that it “won’t cede even half a step on its sovereignty” over the chain of islets, Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said Nov. 5 in Beijing.
“To be honest, there is a gap between us,” Japanese Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba told reporters Nov. 6 in Tokyo. “I feel this is going to take some time.”
The dispute potentially could grow into a military face- off, according to a confidential report submitted last week to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by a delegation of former U.S. officials.
Both Japan’s parts-makers and China’s economy would lose from such a clash, said Shoichi Ito, a Kwansei Gakuin University economics professor.
“If China causes these industries to move out, it will be the equivalent strangling their own necks in the long term, as China is undergoing the transition from labour intensive to high value-added industries,” said Ito, author of “Labor Markets in Modern China.” “The impact will be traumatic.”
Register now to access all features including:
All for free!
Welcome to Wheels!
As a final step we've sent a confirmation to your email address as a security measure. Please click the link in the email to complete your registration.
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TORONTO STAR IS PROVIDING THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES ON AN "AS IS" AND â€œAS AVAILABLEâ€ BASIS AND MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, IN ANY CONNECTION WITH THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES, THEIR CONTENTS, OR ANY WEB SITE OR CONTENTS WITH WHICH IT IS LINKED. TORONTO STAR DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE FUNCTION OF THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES OR THEIR CONTENTS WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES OR THE SERVERS THAT MAKE IT AVAILABLE ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS.
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NEGLIGENCE, SHALL TORONTO STAR BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF INCOME OR PROFIT, LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, OR FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY COMPENSATORY, INCIDENTAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES), EVEN IF TORONTO STAR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES OR LOSSES, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES, THEIR CONTENTS, OR ANY WEBSITE OR CONTENTS WITH WHICH IT IS LINKED. IN NO EVENT SHALL TORONTO STARâ€™S TOTAL LIABILITY FOR ALL DAMAGES, LOSSES, AND CAUSES OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NEGLIGENCE), OR OTHERWISE, EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY YOU FOR ACCESSING THIS SITE.X