It irks me to hear radio and newspaper reporters and TV media describe a traffic crash as if there were no people involved.
“An SUV lost control today…” is a popular phrasing or “Two trucks were involved in an accident…” is another way the media report on what was essentially human error.
Statistics show that 95% of crashes and collision are avoidable and are caused by one or more drivers screwing up and the others involved not knowing how to avoid the ensuing mayhem.
The car or SUV did not lose control. The driver did!
Drivers, both motorists and truckers, cause the vast majority of crashes and collisions. It’s not the vehicles, bad roads or severe weather.
When reporting a crash, let’s place the blame where it should be, with the drivers.
Instead of saying the SUV lost control and rolled in the ditch these reporters should be saying the SUV driver lost control and now their SUV is upside down in a ditch. They should report that two truckers crashed their rigs rather than implying the trucks were at fault.
The other annoying term is “car accident”. Instead of talking about the driver crashing their car this type of reporting implies it was an accident. This has a connotation that there was nothing anybody could do about the crash. “It was an accident.”
Look up the word “accident” and you’ll come across definitions such as “An event that takes place without one’s foresight or expectation; an undesigned, sudden, and unexpected event” when in actual fact if a driver is well trained they should always expect the worst and hope for the best. Good drivers are always looking for the unexpected, the “what if…” as we say in our advanced driving courses.
Since we are dealing with driver error, reports should leave the word accident out of the equation. The term “accident” should be reserved for the time a meteor comes streaking out of space and lands on someone’s vehicle. That, my friends, was an accident.
I have heard people blame “bad roads” as a reason for some crashes. There are no bad roads. There are poorly trained drivers using these roads who are not driving within the limits of that particular road. One of these that comes to mind is Canal Rd. near Holland Landing.
I have heard people refer to this as a dangerous road. Why, because it’s beside a canal and can ice up? Any road can ice up and many roads travel beside a body of water.
Every motorist should drive within the limits of their driving environment.
If every motorist or trucker using that road paid attention to their driving environment and thought to themselves, “This road is narrow and can ice up today so I should slow down and stay off my cell phone so I can focus on my driving,” then maybe there would not be those “terrible accidents” that tend to be blamed on the road instead of the user.
Too many times I have heard motorists say, “My car lost control…” or “I must have hit black ice…” placing the blame everywhere but on the human who was in control of the vehicle.
I think it would be a great idea if reports started to include the human aspect in the multitude of crashes we hear and read about.
Maybe this factor would get a few more motorists thinking that there aren’t just vehicles involved in these crashes but there is also a very serious human factor involved.
These aren’t just vehicles colliding with one another but drivers causing vehicles to crash into each other. It’s a serious human problem with severe injuries or death often involved. It is not simply mechanical objects getting destroyed because one went astray.
Everything you need to know about purchasing, maintaining and driving your car.
Become a member
Register now to access all features including:
- Save and ask friends to review vehicles
- Exclusive rebates & offers from local dealers
- Premium content, reviews and tools
All for free!
Already a member?
Registration 2 of 2
Welcome to Wheels!
As a final step we've sent a confirmation to your email address as a security measure. Please click the link in the email to complete your registration.
Terms of services
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TORONTO STAR IS PROVIDING THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES ON AN "AS IS" AND â€œAS AVAILABLEâ€ BASIS AND MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, IN ANY CONNECTION WITH THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES, THEIR CONTENTS, OR ANY WEB SITE OR CONTENTS WITH WHICH IT IS LINKED. TORONTO STAR DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE FUNCTION OF THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES OR THEIR CONTENTS WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES OR THE SERVERS THAT MAKE IT AVAILABLE ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS.
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NEGLIGENCE, SHALL TORONTO STAR BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF INCOME OR PROFIT, LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, OR FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY COMPENSATORY, INCIDENTAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES), EVEN IF TORONTO STAR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES OR LOSSES, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES, THEIR CONTENTS, OR ANY WEBSITE OR CONTENTS WITH WHICH IT IS LINKED. IN NO EVENT SHALL TORONTO STARâ€™S TOTAL LIABILITY FOR ALL DAMAGES, LOSSES, AND CAUSES OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NEGLIGENCE), OR OTHERWISE, EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY YOU FOR ACCESSING THIS SITE.X