Have there ever been darker days for station wagon fans?
Though wagons are the sleekest and sportiest of utility vehicles, in the past year alone, we’ve had to say goodbye to the Dodge Magnum, Ford Focus, Mazda6 Sport Wagon, PT Cruiser and Chevrolet Optima.
Of course, “Station wagons become unpopular!” isn’t exactly headline news. For the past 30 years, we wagon lovers have had to grit our collective teeth as minivans and SUVs became the choice for practical automotive needs.
I’m not naÃ¯ve. Most see car-based crossovers for what they are: tall station wagons masquerading as macho truck-based SUVs, with increased carrying capacity and the illusion of safety the main appeal of these rolling rec rooms.
Other suspects in the death of the wagon include our super-sized culture with its “bigger is better” mantra and all those mythical soccer/hockey/ballet moms who feel the need to give “everyone” a ride home (hey kids, take the bus!)
But really, with so many positives outweighing the negatives, why would you not choose a good ol’ station wagon over a sedan, minivan or crossover/SUV?
1) Buying a wagon is like getting free money. Without adding to the fundamental driving dynamics or style of a sedan, you get more cargo room and the added utility of that fifth-door hatch.
2) How many of you tall vehicle drivers have had a recent white-knuckle driving experience on a windy day? From a dynamic safety standpoint (the ability to avoid an accident), wagons have two key advantages over those taller and tippier alternatives: a lower centre of gravity and less resistance to side winds.
3) Wagons, with their inherently lower profile, are also friendlier to the wind straight on. A slicker shape means better fuel economy and less harmful emissions.
4) I don’t care how many electronic nannies are stuffed into any top-heavy crossover-utility-thingee; any sedan-based wagon will deliver more driving pleasure. Trust me.
But recent sales numbers don’t lie. Take one example in the wagon versus SUV debate.
Despite the BMW X3 SUV and 3-Series wagon having an MSRP within $200 of each other, similar acceleration, equipment levels, safety ratings and even cargo space, BMW Canada sold less than one 3 wagon for every 10 of its X3 last year.
Not to mention, the 3-Series wagon gets better fuel consumption ratings: 12.2/7.7 L/100 km versus 12.5/8.2 for the X3.
And beyond the obvious advantages X3 owners cited as reasons to buy – a taller seating position and ease of entry – even the automaker admits fashion is a big reason buyers choose the SUV over the wagon.
BMW Canada admits picking an X3 over a 3 wagon might simply be the overall popularity and proliferation of the SUV-type vehicle in the marketplace.
The German automaker also noted that in Europe, the Touring (or shooting-brake) body-style is and has always been far more accepted across the board. Which only adds to my argument: Looking cool while driving a minivan or SUV go together like the Leafs and the Stanley Cup.
So do we woe-begotten wagon lovers have any hope that our forlorn yet favourite automotive form will receive greater acceptance? Will we forever be shackled to utility vehicles that drive and look like lunch boxes? Will car buyers release themselves of the false burden of needing a vehicle to tow their boat twice a year, chauffeur six of our kid’s friends home from the birthday party, or carry a 4 x 8 sheet of plywood for that DIY project you’ll never finish anyway?
I don’t know. But I do have hope.
My back-to-the-future solution for automakers wrestling with a 6.7L/100 km fleet average and nano-emissions future is simple: Wagons ho!
Columns Everything you need to know about purchasing, maintaining and driving your car.
Become a member
Register now to access all features including:
- Save and ask friends to review vehicles
- Exclusive rebates & offers from local dealers
- Premium content, reviews and tools
- You can unsubscribe at any time. Please Contact Us for details.
All for free!
Already a member?
Registration 2 of 2
Welcome to Wheels!
As a final step we've sent a confirmation to your email address as a security measure. Please click the link in the email to complete your registration.
Terms of services
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TORONTO STAR IS PROVIDING THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS AND MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, IN ANY CONNECTION WITH THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES, THEIR CONTENTS, OR ANY WEB SITE OR CONTENTS WITH WHICH IT IS LINKED. TORONTO STAR DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE FUNCTION OF THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES OR THEIR CONTENTS WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES OR THE SERVERS THAT MAKE IT AVAILABLE ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS.
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NEGLIGENCE, SHALL TORONTO STAR BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF INCOME OR PROFIT, LOSS OF OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, OR FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY COMPENSATORY, INCIDENTAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES), EVEN IF TORONTO STAR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES OR LOSSES, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OF THE TORONTO STAR WEBSITES, THEIR CONTENTS, OR ANY WEBSITE OR CONTENTS WITH WHICH IT IS LINKED. IN NO EVENT SHALL TORONTO STAR'S TOTAL LIABILITY FOR ALL DAMAGES, LOSSES, AND CAUSES OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, NEGLIGENCE), OR OTHERWISE, EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID BY YOU FOR ACCESSING THIS SITE.X